Grocery code of conduct could encourage investment, innovation: advocates
Medline worried not only about whether such fees were fair, but also about an "exodus" of manufacturers from Canada, resulting in lost jobs, risks to prices, and longer supply chains.
"I was worried that ... if the industry couldn't clean itself up, that government was going to get involved," he said.
Medline told The Canadian Press in a joint interview with Michael Graydon, CEO of the Food, Health & Consumer Products Canada association, that the industry can only benefit from clearer rules over negotiations and disagreements.
Graydon led the group that created the code and now chairs its interim board.
He said the grocery retail industry in Canada has consolidated over time, resulting in a power imbalance between retailers and suppliers. Graydon believes the cost implications of that imbalance for suppliers has resulted in a reduction in capital investment and innovation.
One of the code’s provisions deals with forecasting and ordering, with the aim to bring more discipline to the process and reduce compliance fines for short orders, Graydon said. He believes the code could lower costs for manufacturers by reducing the number and scale of fines they face from retailers.
There are some large companies whose Canadian manufacturing capacity is much less than it used to be, said Graydon, as it’s been moved to the U.S.
“If that financial security and economic certainty is there, then I'm hopeful we're going to see much more economic investment and innovation and capital investment in their plans from those big multinationals.”
The code is set to be officially in place next June, with the creation of an office to oversee it underway.
Hiring for the grocery code adjudicator has begun, and the team is working on a more detailed dispute resolution process, Graydon said. There will be mechanisms for arbitration and binding arbitration, but he’s hoping most disputes will be ironed out before it comes to that.
The fact the code is voluntary means the adjudicator won't be able to levy any fines, said Graydon. But he thinks that the threat of “name and shame” can be powerful, as can the threat of the code being made mandatory by the government if its effectiveness isn’t proven.
Medline and Graydon say some companies, both manufacturers and retailers, are already changing their behaviour in anticipation of the code. They’re both hopeful the code will over time transform relationships within the food industry and spark more confidence in companies to invest in their Canadian operations.
"Over (a) longer period of time, I want to see a better industry where manufacturers want to do business here," Medline said.